Buy the book

Reading

Other projects

technicalities




« Aquaman's divine origins? | Main | SF Gospel is Sci Fi Scanner's site of the week! »

September 01, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ce22f53ef00e554d7dbcb8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I sure hope Orson Scott Card wasn't this much of a jerk when he wrote Speaker for the Dead:

Comments

Elliot

Ouch!

I fail to see a link between the government's marriage policies, which are mainly economic, and the moral & religious state of Mr. Card's marriage. But maybe it makes more sense to a Mormon who presumably views the American government as some kind of divinely anointed providential agent.

This reminds me of a blog post I once read by a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy. He boasted with great pride in his new denomination, because when a rogue priest blessed a same-sex marriage in an Orthodox chapel, some other priests went over and tore down the chapel, brick by brick, so as to erase the spiritual pollution, etc. This, the blogger ranted, was the only proper response to such a horrendous abomination, etc. Such a response seemed to indicate that he had taken to worshipping a graceless code of purity and propriety, defining himself far more by what he hated than by what he loved. Same goes for Card's call to overthrow the government. A little out of proportion. Maybe he should donate some money to fund marriage counselors instead or something.

Richard

I'm afraid you've just lost several readers, myself included, with your inflammatory and unjustified rhetoric against Orson Scott Card's positions.
You'll find that quite a lot
Christians and Americans - a great majority of them, in fact - aren't supportive of homosexual advocacy politics, especially when done with such bluntness as you just did from a so-called Christian standpoint.

Being a Christian liberal shouldn't be an excuse to be a hardcore Sodom & Ghomorra crusader.

Card = 1, McKee = 0

Gabriel Mckee

Wow... how to respond?

Well, first of all-- how long have you actually been reading this site? I have made no secret of my support for gay rights in general and marriage equality in particular. Just a few weeks ago I shared a pastoral prayer I wrote for my church's Pride Sunday service, in fact. Any readers that this loses me haven't been reading very long, or very closely, to begin with. Would you rather I lied about my beliefs? Fat chance of that.

Second, "inflammatory and unjustified"? Well, yeah, I guess I did call him a jerk. I may be willing to grant this one. But I ain't apologizing, because I really think he is a jerk, and I really do hope he wasn't a jerk 20 years ago, because I do really like "Speaker for the Dead."

As for "great majorities"-- numbers do not make one's positions just.

As for the "so-called Christian" crack-- is that really the kind of road you want to travel? If so, before long you'll be like Fred Phelps-- convinced that the 30 people who can tolerate you are the only true Christians in the world. Your church may disagree with mine on this one issue, but if you think that means my church isn't Christian... well...

Next up-- being a Mormon, or a conservative evangelical, or whatever, shouldn't be an excuse to advocate the overthrow of the government when it extends rights to people who disagree with you.

And lastly-- "Sodom and Gomorrah crusader"? I kind of like that. But I'll spell "Gomorrah" correctly, if you don't mind.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment